Skip to content

Conversation

@Julesboul
Copy link
Contributor

@Julesboul Julesboul commented Nov 5, 2025

Tests were fixed, so that it will be easier to know when something is broken.

The github workflow was refactored and is now easier.

In addition, the functionnalities put in Experiment Model repository were deleted from DebuggingSpy and the dependancy added in the baseline.

Comment on lines 7 to 8
#traits : 'TLogger',
#classTraits : 'TLogger classTrait',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Finalement je me demande si TLogger n'est pas trop général, au sens où il pourrait y avoir un trait générique comme ça dans Pharo, indépendant de DSSpy.

Est-ce qu'il ne faudrait pas "T-quelquechose-Logger" ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oui en effet c'est très générique, on risque d'avoir des conflits !

Vu que c'est rattaché aux expériences, ça pourrait être un truc comme T-ExperimentModel-Logger

@StevenCostiou StevenCostiou mentioned this pull request Dec 16, 2025
Merged
@StevenCostiou StevenCostiou merged commit d50a22a into Pharo-XP-Tools:P12 Dec 18, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants