Update llm_client.py

[sumansaurabh]

Description

• Introduced a new parameter additonal_param_2 to the generate_commit_summary method for improved functionality.
• Updated the method signature to include the new parameter, enhancing its flexibility.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	llm_client.py Enhance generate_commit_summary with additional parameter penify_hook/llm_client.py Added a new parameter additonal_param_2 to the generate_commit_summary method. Updated the method signature to accommodate the new parameter. +1/-1

---

💡 Penify usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward, involving a single method signature update with an additional parameter.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Maintainability	Correct the spelling of parameter names for clarity and consistency Ensure that the parameter names are consistent and correctly spelled to avoid confusion and potential errors. penify_hook/llm_client.py [40] -additonal_param: str = "", additonal_param_2: str = "" +additional_param: str = "", additional_param_2: str = "" Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a spelling mistake in the parameter names, which enhances code clarity and consistency.	9
Possible bug	Update the return type to reflect the possibility of returning None Ensure that the return type is consistent with the actual return value to avoid confusion and potential type errors. penify_hook/llm_client.py [40] --> Dict: +-> Optional[Dict]: Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion addresses a potential issue with the return type, which is important for type safety and clarity in the code.	8
Possible issue	Add input validation for parameters to ensure they are of the expected types Consider validating the input parameters to ensure they meet expected formats or types to prevent runtime errors. penify_hook/llm_client.py [40] -def generate_commit_summary(self, diff: str, message: str, generate_description: bool, repo_details: Dict, jira_context: Dict = None, additonal_param: str = "", additonal_param_2: str = "") -> Dict: +def generate_commit_summary(self, diff: str, message: str, generate_description: bool, repo_details: Dict, jira_context: Dict = None, additional_param: str = "", additional_param_2: str = "") -> Dict: + if not isinstance(diff, str) or not isinstance(message, str): + raise ValueError("diff and message must be strings") Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: While input validation is a good practice, the suggestion does not directly relate to the changes made in the PR, which primarily focuses on parameter renaming.	7
Best practice	Rename the method to enhance clarity regarding its functionality Consider using a more descriptive name for the method to clarify its purpose and improve code readability. penify_hook/llm_client.py [40] -def generate_commit_summary(self, diff: str, message: str, generate_description: bool, repo_details: Dict, jira_context: Dict = None, additonal_param: str = "", additonal_param_2: str = "") -> Dict: +def create_commit_summary(self, diff: str, message: str, generate_description: bool, repo_details: Dict, jira_context: Dict = None, additional_param: str = "", additional_param_2: str = "") -> Dict: Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion to rename the method is valid for improving readability, but it is not critical to the functionality introduced in this PR.	6