Feat: Addded support for more robust parsing

[sumansaurabh]

Description

• Introduced a new function to extract types from nested braces in JSDoc comments.
• Enhanced the parameter parsing logic to support nested parameters and default values.
• Improved handling of the @description tag to concatenate descriptions correctly.
• Added comprehensive unit tests to validate the new features and ensure robustness.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	parser.py Enhance JSDoc Parser with Nested Parameter Support              jsdoc_parser/parser.py Added a new function _extract_type_from_braces for handling nested braces in JSDoc. Enhanced parameter parsing to support nested parameters, default values, and improved regex patterns. Special handling for the @description tag to append to the description field. Updated existing parameter and return type handling to accommodate more complex scenarios. +174/-72
Tests	test_parser_comprehensive.py Comprehensive Tests for JSDoc Parser Functionality              tests/test_parser_comprehensive.py Added comprehensive unit tests for various JSDoc parsing scenarios. Included tests for handling nested parameters, complex types, and special cases. Implemented tests for new features and edge cases in the JSDoc parser. +985/-0

---

💡 Penify usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	4, because the changes involve significant enhancements to the JSDoc parser with new logic for nested parameters and default values, as well as comprehensive unit tests that require thorough verification.
🧪 Relevant tests	Yes
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible bug	Prevent potential infinite loops in nested parameter handling by adding a self-reference check Refactor the logic for handling nested parameters to avoid potential infinite loops when parameters reference themselves. jsdoc_parser/parser.py [203-204] -203 + if '.' in param_name: +203 + if '.' in param_name and param_name != nested_name: 204 + parent_name, nested_name = param_name.split('.', 1) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: This suggestion effectively prevents a potential infinite loop scenario, which is a significant issue in the code. The self-reference check is a crucial improvement for maintaining code stability.	9
	Add error handling for unmatched braces in the type extraction logic Ensure that the brace counting logic in _extract_type_from_braces correctly handles cases where there are unmatched opening braces. jsdoc_parser/parser.py [106-111] 106 + brace_count = 0 107 + for i, char in enumerate(content): 108 + if char == '{': 109 + brace_count += 1 110 + elif char == '}': 111 + brace_count -= 1 +112 + if brace_count < 0: # Handle unmatched closing brace +113 + raise ValueError("Unmatched closing brace in content") Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion addresses a potential bug in the brace counting logic that could lead to runtime errors if unmatched braces are encountered. Adding error handling improves the robustness of the code.	8
Possible issue	Ensure regex patterns in parameter processing handle cases with missing descriptions Modify the regex patterns used in _process_tag to ensure they correctly handle edge cases, such as parameters with no description. jsdoc_parser/parser.py [156] -156 + param_match = re.match(r'(?:\[)?([a-zA-Z_$][\w$.]*)(?:=([^]]+))?(?:\])?\s*(?:-\s*(.*))?$', remaining) +156 + param_match = re.match(r'(?:\[)?([a-zA-Z_$][\w$.]*)(?:=([^]]+))?(?:\])?\s*(?:-\s*(.*))?$', remaining) or (None, None, None, '') Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion improves the regex handling for parameters without descriptions, which is a valid concern. However, the proposed change may not fully address all edge cases, hence a slightly lower score.	7
	Initialize result fields to avoid potential KeyErrors when accessing them Ensure that the result dictionary is initialized with an empty list for 'params', 'returns', and 'throws' to avoid KeyErrors. jsdoc_parser/parser.py [277-279] -277 + result['returns'] = { +277 + result.setdefault('returns', []).append({ 278 + 'type': returns_type, 279 + 'description': returns_desc Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Initializing the result dictionary fields is a good practice to prevent KeyErrors, but it addresses a minor issue rather than a critical bug. Thus, it receives a moderate score.	6