Update OGA App to use NPM published libraries @jsonforms/core#180
Update OGA App to use NPM published libraries @jsonforms/core#180mushrafmim merged 1 commit intoOpenNSW:mainfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @ginaxu1, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request modernizes the OGA App's form handling by migrating from a custom-built JSON form solution to the Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a significant improvement, replacing the custom JSON form implementation with the standard @jsonforms library. This greatly reduces the amount of custom code to maintain and aligns the application with industry standards. The integration in WorkflowDetailScreen.tsx is well-executed, and the backend change in oga/internal/store.go to handle different data types for JSONB scanning is a solid enhancement for robustness. I've added a couple of suggestions to further improve type safety in the new implementation.
No description provided.