PDF Processing Improvements - Table Extraction #32
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SeanClay10
changed the title
raymondcen
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2026
Collaborator
raymondcen
left a comment
raymondcen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved, looks good.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This MR extends the PDF preprocessing pipeline to support automatic table extraction in addition to text extraction. Tables are detected and extracted using PyMuPDF by default, with a camelot-py fallback for cases where PyMuPDF fails to detect tables. Extracted tables are saved as structured JSON alongside the extracted text.