luaPlugins.lua-resty-lrucache: init at 0.13; luaPlugins.lua-resty-core: init at 0.1.24

[SuperSandro2000]

Description of changes

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.05 Release Notes (or backporting 22.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[teto]

both are available on luarocks: https://luarocks.org/search?q=lua-resty-core+ https://luarocks.org/modules/avlubimov/lua-resty-lrucache , can we generate them instead please ? makes maintainance easier.

[SuperSandro2000]

Those are unofficial outdated uploads. For lua-resty-lrucache the version on rocks is 0.09 and 0.13 in the repo.

[teto]

you can use rockspecs from the repo too. The issue is that the repo doesn't contain any rockspec. One can pass an alternative rockspec but it would be easier for everyone if openresty/lua-resty-lrucache#42 could be merged. Maybe nudge the maintainers and ask for an update on luarocks.org while at it ?

[SuperSandro2000]

but do we really need one? I have tested the package locally already and it worked.