[Snyk] Fix for 3 vulnerabilities #46
Conversation
The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies: - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-REQUESTS-10305723 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-10390193 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-10390194
Reviewer's GuideThis PR upgrades two vulnerable pip dependencies in the documentation requirements, bumping requests from 2.31.0 to 2.32.4 and urllib3 from 2.0.7 to 2.5.0 to remediate the reported security issues. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Your free trial has ended. If you'd like to continue receiving code reviews, you can add a payment method here.
|
Important Review skippedIgnore keyword(s) in the title. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR updates vulnerable pip dependencies to address security issues flagged by Snyk.
- Upgrades
requestsfrom 2.31.0 to 2.32.4 - Upgrades
urllib3from 2.0.7 to 2.5.0
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)
docs/requirements.txt:49
- Confirm that
requests==2.32.4is compatible withurllib3==2.5.0, as mismatched version constraints between these packages can lead to runtime errors. Adjust theurllib3constraint if needed to satisfy Requests’ requirements.
requests==2.32.4 ; python_version >= "3.8" and python_version < "4.0"
docs/requirements.txt:74
- [nitpick] Add or update integration tests for HTTP client functionality to catch any breaking changes introduced by upgrading
urllib3to 2.5.0.
urllib3==2.5.0 ; python_version >= "3.8" and python_version < "4.0"
🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.✅ security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details) ✅ code/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details) |
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @jhassine, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, aims to enhance the project's security posture by updating two key Python dependencies, requests and urllib3, to their latest versions. These upgrades are specifically targeted at resolving three identified vulnerabilities within the project's pip dependencies, ensuring the project uses more secure and up-to-date components.
Highlights
- Security Vulnerability Fixes: This pull request addresses three identified security vulnerabilities by upgrading specific Python dependencies. These fixes were automatically generated by Snyk.
- Dependency Upgrades: The
docs/requirements.txtfile has been updated to upgrade therequestslibrary from version2.31.0to2.32.4and theurllib3library from version2.0.7to2.5.0.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
|
Running Code Quality on PRs by uploading data to Trunk will soon be removed. You can still run checks on your PRs using trunk-action - see the migration guide for more information. |
|
No issues found, good job! 👍 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, aims to fix security vulnerabilities by updating requests and urllib3 in docs/requirements.txt. While the intent is correct, the change is applied to what appears to be a generated file. The project uses Poetry for dependency management, so the proper fix should involve updating dependencies via Poetry (which would update poetry.lock) and then regenerating docs/requirements.txt. Applying the change directly to docs/requirements.txt is likely to be overwritten and is not the correct workflow for this project, making the fix temporary.
| referencing==0.30.2 ; python_version >= "3.8" and python_version < "4.0" | ||
| requests-cache==1.1.0 ; python_version >= "3.8" and python_version < "4.0" | ||
| requests==2.31.0 ; python_version >= "3.8" and python_version < "4.0" | ||
| requests==2.32.4 ; python_version >= "3.8" and python_version < "4.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for addressing these vulnerabilities. However, this project uses Poetry for dependency management, and docs/requirements.txt appears to be a generated file. The source of truth for dependencies is pyproject.toml.
Modifying this file directly is not the correct approach for a few reasons:
- Temporary Fix: These changes will likely be overwritten the next time the file is regenerated from the Poetry lock file, nullifying the security patch.
- Inconsistency: It creates a mismatch between the dependencies declared in
pyproject.toml/poetry.lockand those used for building documentation.
The recommended way to apply this fix is:
- Update the dependencies using Poetry. Running
poetry update requestsshould updaterequestsand its dependencyurllib3in thepoetry.lockfile. - Regenerate this
requirements.txtfile from the updated lock file. The command is likely similar topoetry export -f requirements.txt --output docs/requirements.txt --without-hashes. - Commit the updated
poetry.lockanddocs/requirements.txtfiles.
Since this PR was automatically generated, it likely couldn't follow this project-specific workflow. I'd suggest closing this PR and creating a new one that follows the correct procedure to ensure the vulnerabilities are fixed permanently.
Snyk has created this PR to fix 3 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.
Snyk changed the following file(s):
docs/requirements.txtImportant
Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.
For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic
Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:
🦉 Open Redirect
Summary by Sourcery
Update documentation requirements to bump vulnerable dependencies and remediate security issues
Bug Fixes:
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Update
requestslibrary to version 2.32.4 andurllib3library to version 2.5.0 indocs/requirements.txt.Why are these changes being made?
These updates fix three vulnerabilities detected by Snyk in previous versions of the
requestsandurllib3libraries, enhancing the security of the application. The specific versions chosen comply with compatibility requirements for Python versions between 3.8 and 4.0.Summary by Bito
This pull request upgrades the `requests` library from 2.31.0 to 2.32.4 and `urllib3` from 2.0.7 to 2.5.0, addressing three vulnerabilities in the project's pip dependencies. These updates enhance application security while maintaining compatibility with Python versions 3.8 to 4.0.This change is