Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a standalone NVSentinel governance policy defining hierarchical roles (Contributors, Reviewers, Approvers, Maintainers, Technical Leads/Project Chairs), responsibilities and privileges, decision-making and escalation processes for code and architecture, areas of ownership, role advancement paths, release and modification procedures, and contact guidance. (49 words) Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@GOVERNANCE.md`:
- Around line 124-135: The Pull Request Process and Review Requirements sections
are inconsistent about who must approve PRs; update the GOVERNANCE.md text so
roles and actions are precise and non-contradictory: either change the general
rule in the "Pull Request Process" section to read "All pull requests require at
least one review from an Approver or Reviewer" (or "at least one review" if you
want reviews only) or change the "Small changes" line in "Review Requirements"
to require "1 Approver approval" instead of "1 Reviewer approval"; ensure you
reference the section headers "Pull Request Process" and "Review Requirements"
and the phrases "All pull requests require at least one review/approval" and
"Small changes (documentation, typo fixes): 1 Reviewer approval" when making the
edit so terminology matches role capabilities (Reviewer vs Approver).
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
GOVERNANCE.md (2)
7-7: Hyphenate compound adjective."High quality" should be hyphenated when used as a compound adjective before a noun: "high-quality standards".
📝 Suggested fix
-NVSentinel follows a hierarchical governance model similar to other Kubernetes ecosystem projects. This structure ensures that contributions are properly reviewed, architectural decisions are well-considered, and the project maintains high quality standards while remaining accessible to new contributors. +NVSentinel follows a hierarchical governance model similar to other Kubernetes ecosystem projects. This structure ensures that contributions are properly reviewed, architectural decisions are well-considered, and the project maintains high-quality standards while remaining accessible to new contributors.
215-220: Consider documenting current role holders.The governance document clearly defines roles and responsibilities but doesn't specify who currently holds each role. Consider either:
- Adding a section listing current Maintainers, Technical Leads, and area-specific Approvers/Reviewers, or
- Pointing to where this information is maintained (e.g., a
MAINTAINERS.mdfile, GitHub teams page, or project website)This would improve transparency and help contributors know who to contact for specific areas.
Signed-off-by: nkapoor <nkapoor@nvidia.com>
This reverts commit 185cf55. Signed-off-by: nkapoor <nkapoor@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: nkapoor <nkapoor@nvidia.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@GOVERNANCE.md`:
- Line 7: Replace the unhyphenated compound adjective "high quality standards"
in the sentence inside GOVERNANCE.md with the hyphenated form "high-quality
standards" so the phrase reads "maintains high-quality standards" to follow
grammar rules for compound adjectives before nouns.
|
|
||
| ## Overview | ||
|
|
||
| NVSentinel follows a hierarchical governance model similar to other Kubernetes ecosystem projects. This structure ensures that contributions are properly reviewed, architectural decisions are well-considered, and the project maintains high quality standards while remaining accessible to new contributors. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hyphenate the compound adjective.
“high quality standards” should be “high-quality standards.”
✍️ Suggested edit
-NVSentinel follows a hierarchical governance model similar to other Kubernetes ecosystem projects. This structure ensures that contributions are properly reviewed, architectural decisions are well-considered, and the project maintains high quality standards while remaining accessible to new contributors.
+NVSentinel follows a hierarchical governance model similar to other Kubernetes ecosystem projects. This structure ensures that contributions are properly reviewed, architectural decisions are well-considered, and the project maintains high-quality standards while remaining accessible to new contributors.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| NVSentinel follows a hierarchical governance model similar to other Kubernetes ecosystem projects. This structure ensures that contributions are properly reviewed, architectural decisions are well-considered, and the project maintains high quality standards while remaining accessible to new contributors. | |
| NVSentinel follows a hierarchical governance model similar to other Kubernetes ecosystem projects. This structure ensures that contributions are properly reviewed, architectural decisions are well-considered, and the project maintains high-quality standards while remaining accessible to new contributors. |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~7-~7: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...nsidered, and the project maintains high quality standards while remaining access...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@GOVERNANCE.md` at line 7, Replace the unhyphenated compound adjective "high
quality standards" in the sentence inside GOVERNANCE.md with the hyphenated form
"high-quality standards" so the phrase reads "maintains high-quality standards"
to follow grammar rules for compound adjectives before nouns.
|
/ok to test 7e988ba |
| - Can participate in release planning and decisions | ||
|
|
||
| **How to become one**: | ||
| 1. Be an active Reviewer for at least 3 months |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think one of the criteria should also be to deliver a feature end to end starting from design
| - Can manage project settings and repositories | ||
|
|
||
| **How to become one**: | ||
| 1. Be an active Approver for at least 6 months |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should also some more details on what it means to be active, i.e., features contributed, PRs reviewed etc
| ### Design and Architecture Decisions | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **Proposal Process**: | ||
| - Create a GitHub Discussion or issue with the `design` label |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not sure if we have this label
| 1. **Proposal Process**: | ||
| - Create a GitHub Discussion or issue with the `design` label | ||
| - Tag relevant Maintainers and Approvers | ||
| - Allow at least 1 week for community feedback |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 week I think is a bit too long. For a project that is pre-alpha, I think we should be in a position to rapidly iterate
Summary
Type of Change
Component(s) Affected
Testing
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit