Skip to content

Conversation

@P403n1x87
Copy link
Contributor

Treat all sources as Cython sources for improved performance

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 4.29%. Comparing base (317dd0f) to head (86db41f).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (317dd0f) and HEAD (86db41f). Click for more details.

HEAD has 4 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (317dd0f) HEAD (86db41f)
6 2
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #176       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.37%   4.29%   -91.09%     
==========================================
  Files           7       7               
  Lines        2142    2142               
  Branches      483     483               
==========================================
- Hits         2043      92     -1951     
- Misses         56    2040     +1984     
+ Partials       43      10       -33     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@MatthieuDartiailh
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for opening this. I am not sure when I will be able to follow up. Among the failures I noticed a comparison of instruction name which could be optimized as an integer comparison.

@MatthieuDartiailh
Copy link
Owner

I tried rebasing but now all tests are failing...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants