Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #35 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 74.28% 74.28%
=======================================
Files 8 8
Lines 140 140
=======================================
Hits 104 104
Misses 36 36 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Great, thanks! |
|
I might have spoken too soon 😅. 1 test is currently breaking in our resampling PR. Will take a quick look |
|
Ahhh, ok. This line, for example, tries to replace a mutable field with another one, which fails as expected when Spectra.jl/test/transforms/resample.jl Line 22 in 46dfee4 I think sprinkling in a dot, e.g., Would it make sense to just return a new immutable struct instead? |
|
Thanks for checking, sounds like there's an issue in the test code, not in the package code? I think for resampling as per #26 we want to return a new instance rather than mutating an existing one. I'm not sure the |
|
sgtm! Dropped in the other PR and will go ahead and merge here |
Closes #34