Include isAdvancedSearchFieldType property#333
Merged
ofahimIQSS merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom Jul 22, 2025
Merged
Conversation
g-saracca
added
Size: 3
ChengShi-1
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2025
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In Review 🔎
to Ready for QA ⏩
in IQSS Dataverse Project
Contributor
|
tests are passing - merging PR |
ofahimIQSS
deleted the
feat/332-include-isAdvancedSearchFieldType-property
branch
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Ready for QA ⏩
to Merged 🚀
in IQSS Dataverse Project
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Return new
isAdvancedSearchFieldTypeproperty from API inGetCollectionMetadataBlocks&GetMetadataBlockByNameuse cases.Which issue(s) this PR closes:
Related Dataverse PRs:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Suggestions on how to test this:
Check tests are passing.
Is there a release notes update needed for this change?:
Additional documentation: