enhance status check: add cache cleanup step and improve error diagnostic #6
Conversation
WalkthroughTwo minor enhancements were made: a workflow step to clean the Go module cache before repository checkout, and diagnostic logging added to the door status check script when target device lookup fails or properties are unavailable. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
scripts/door_status/check-status.go (2)
96-101: Consider consolidating the diagnostic output.The diagnostic output helpfully lists available device IDs for debugging. However, multiple
fmt.Fprintfcalls could be consolidated for better efficiency.🔎 Proposed refactor
- // More diagnostics for debugging - fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "Available device IDs: ") - for _, d := range deviceList { - fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "%s ", d.DeviceId) - } - fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr) + // More diagnostics for debugging + ids := make([]string, 0, len(deviceList)) + for _, d := range deviceList { + ids = append(ids, d.DeviceId) + } + fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "Available device IDs: %s\n", strings.Join(ids, " "))Note: This requires importing
"strings"at the top of the file.
106-108: Clarify or remove the misleading comment.The comment at line 107 suggests conditional exit behavior ("Exit gracefully if non-critical, or with error if required"), but the code always executes
os.Exit(1). This could confuse future maintainers.Either update the comment to reflect the actual behavior or remove it if it's a leftover from earlier iterations.
🔎 Proposed fix
fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "Device properties: %+v\n", target.Properties) - // Exit gracefully if non-critical, or with error if required os.Exit(1)Or clarify the intent:
fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "Device properties: %+v\n", target.Properties) - // Exit gracefully if non-critical, or with error if required + // Exit with error as lock status is required for operation os.Exit(1)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/status-check.ymlscripts/door_status/check-status.go
🔇 Additional comments (2)
scripts/door_status/check-status.go (1)
94-109: Good diagnostic improvements.The added diagnostic output significantly improves debuggability when device lookup or property access fails. The approach of printing available device IDs and device properties to stderr follows best practices and will help troubleshoot configuration issues in production.
.github/workflows/status-check.yml (1)
12-13: Verify cache cleanup timing and necessity.The cache cleanup runs before repository checkout, which is unusual. Typically, GitHub Actions runners start with a clean environment. This placement suggests a workaround for corrupted cache from reused runners.
Consider:
- Is this addressing a specific recurring issue with Go module cache corruption?
- Would it be more intuitive to clean after checkout but before "Setup Go"?
- The workflow doesn't explicitly restore/save Go module cache, so is this cleanup necessary?
Run the following to check if there's an implicit Go module cache action or if this is documented elsewhere:
#!/bin/bash # Check for cache-related configuration or documentation rg -i "go.*mod.*cache|cache.*corruption" --type=md --type=yaml -C3
1 participant
Fixed Go module cache extraction errors by cleaning the cache directory before restore. Improved device lock status error handling with better diagnostics for missing properties
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
Bug Fixes
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.