Merged
Conversation
Owner
Uh, the tests have been passing on my machine so I'm not quite sure. Per the documentation it says that |
Foxboron
requested changes
Mar 31, 2025
Owner
Foxboron
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please split into two commits.
One for the race condition.
One for the assert changes.
Foxboron
reviewed
Mar 31, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
Seems like |
Owner
Contributor
Author
|
Cleaned! |
Owner
|
Thanks! |
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR addresses issue #89 by fixing a data race conditions and removing duplicate checks in the test suite.
Changes
internal/keyring/threadkeyring.go- Added error channel to prevent passage of non-initialized errors between goroutines (Now works with --race flag).cmd/ssh-tpm-agent/main_test.go- launching shell after Stdout is assigned and waiting for the exit.internal/keyring/threadkeyring_test.goNotes
I noticed that keyring.ReadKey appears to return syscall.ENOENT when given unknown key, not syscall.ENOKEY as the test expects.
Also
unix.RequestKey(X, description, "", destKeyring)will returnENOENTwith X="user" and "logon", whilstENOKEYwith "Asdasdasd", etc.. Seems like an issue with keyring initialization on my system?