I have many useful changes in this branch now, feel free to cherry pick whatever you want

[intangir]

better fire protection
better lava protection
better for the 1.4.6 item removal issue i mentioned in another thread on cancelled messages
logging of reinforcement breaks to preciousstones snitches
tools are damaged when breaking reinforced blocks even if the block doesnt break

i made a priority change that probably has no difference for you, it was to improve compatibility with a mod you don't use

(also some housekeeping on files that i didn't want in my branch)

[ttk2]

Cool, Cool, I will have Erocs review the pull just because he has been doing maintenance then merge it and put it up for a short testing before placing it online. Thanks for your work man.

[intangir]

Some of these changes may not be ideal as is for civcraft
The tool damaging one adds a lot of expense to breaking things, it works out well on my server because they can be repaired and people don't have 20 tick dro vaults ;) but civcraft is another story

removing diamond tools from the damaged list might be prudent

[erocs]

I made some quick comments, likely more as notes to myself. I like the tool damage, but it may need some adjustment for Civcraft. Thanks!

[intangir]

Ya there is already rioting over it, might want to exclude damage to diamond

[intangir]

I added a new feature that you probably wont want on civcraft, but its pretty cool nonetheless

a default level of protection, "by hand" protection, (uses material 'air' hehe)
it also auto bypasses your own 'by hand' protections
allows reinforcement without issue
you can change group on them too
it also auto removes by hand protection when they are pushed by a piston

i also added a feature to allow hiding of /ctinfo information if your using it on blocks you don't have access to

they can be left off, or turned on based on configuration options
shouldn't effect anything if you leave the features off

[erocs]

For the "by hand" protection, it looks like a free low-grade low-annoyance reinforcement, correct? Pretty cool. We'll have to ask ttk2 but I'm suspecting he won't want to enable it.

We should cherry-pick ed25241, for the /ctinfo change.

[ttk2]

We already add nearly 60,000 reinforcements per day there is no reason to
increase that.
On Feb 22, 2013 12:13 PM, "erocs" notifications@github.com wrote:

For the "by hand" protection, it looks like a free low-grade low-annoyance
reinforcement, correct? Pretty cool. We'll have to ask ttk2 but I'm
suspecting he won't want to enable it.

We should cherry-pick ed25241ed25241,
for the /ctinfo change.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/99#issuecomment-13960322.

[intangir]

might want to include it anyway and leave the option off for civcraft

if the mod is publicly released it is a good idea to offer more options

the reason i wanted it is because im having a hard time keeping new players, even harder when before they learn how to protect their things they are all burned down or griefed

the free protection prevents burning

also i made a quick youtube video explaining the basics of citadel usage since so few of my newer players ever bother to reinforce their stuff.., it didnt help though ;)

i can link it later (dont have access to youtube at work)