Skip to content

Comparative Network Analysis of the PyPI Ecosystem (2016–2025): Mapping the historical transition from Web-centric infrastructure to the AI, Data Science, and Automated Testing era.

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

Empromptu/python-ecosystem-evolution

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

19 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Structural Evolution of the Python Package Ecosystem (2016–2025)

Texto alternativo

🎯 Research Overview

This study presents a comparative topological analysis of the Python Package Index (PyPI) Dependency Network across two temporal snapshots: 2016 and 2025. By modeling the ecosystem as directed graphs, we analyze how the architecture of the network reflects a global transition from web-infrastructure dominance to a data-science and automated testing paradigm.

👥 Authors (FCEN-UBA)

  • Carlos Sarraute
  • Martina Rosario Pérez
  • Juan Ignacio Catania
  • Mateo Guerrero Schmidt
  • Sofia Gutierrez

Department of Computing, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales - Universidad de Buenos Aires

📈 Comparative Network Metrics

Our analysis reveals a massive structural expansion and densification of the ecosystem over a nine-year period:

Metric 2016 Dataset 2025 Dataset
Total Nodes 26,234 295,898
Total Edges 72,252 1,606,337
Average Degree 5.51 10.86
Giant Weakly Connected Component 25,169 nodes 291,204 nodes
Modularity (Louvain) 0.538 0.426

🔍 Key Findings & Industry Evolution

1. The Pivot to Data Science and AI

The comparison of both networks demonstrates a fundamental shift in the ecosystem's "Industry Anchors":

  • 2016 Era: Dominated by web development and compatibility tools such as Django, Six, Sphinx, and Distribute.
  • 2025 Era: Transition toward Data Science, AI, and Scientific Computing, led by NumPy, Pandas, SciPy, and Torch.

2. Professionalization of Software Work

  • Automated Testing: The emergence of Pytest as a top-centrality node in 2025 reflects the universal integration of automated testing and quality assurance into the standard developer workflow.
  • Complexity and Density: The increase in average degree from 5.51 to 10.86 indicates that modern software packages now depend on a significantly larger number of libraries, reflecting higher architectural complexity.

3. Structural Dynamics

  • Connectivity: While both eras feature a massive Weakly Connected Component, the 2025 network exhibits more "diffuse" community boundaries due to increased interconnection, as evidenced by the drop in modularity.
  • Structural Bridges: Libraries such as Requests maintain an influential role across both eras, serving as a primary node for global visibility and communication.

🛠️ Methodology

  • Graph Construction: Directed graphs analyzed using NetworkX.
  • Centrality Metrics: Evaluation of Degree, Closeness, PageRank, and sampled Betweenness Centrality.
  • Community Detection: Implementation of the Louvain Algorithm to detect functional clusters.
  • Textual Analysis: Generation of WordClouds from package descriptions to identify community-specific themes.

📚 Bibliography

  • [1] Gullikson, Kevin. (2016). Python Dependency Analysis.
  • [2] Chugh, V. (2025). Tutorial de pandas en Python: La guía definitiva para principiantes. Datacamp.

About

Comparative Network Analysis of the PyPI Ecosystem (2016–2025): Mapping the historical transition from Web-centric infrastructure to the AI, Data Science, and Automated Testing era.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published