Skip to content

Conversation

@jtimon
Copy link
Contributor

@jtimon jtimon commented Sep 30, 2017

Similar to bitcoin/bitcoin#11426 but based on Based on #276

EDIT: while also:

@jtimon
Copy link
Contributor Author

jtimon commented Sep 30, 2017

@luke-jr perhaps for more easier rebases with respect to bitcoin deployments we should start here, restoring some of it while still getting the upgrades from block 0 for elements chain (one can always opt out of good upgrades with this too).

Also see bitcoin/bitcoin#11430 for a potential backport.

@jtimon
Copy link
Contributor Author

jtimon commented Oct 4, 2017

Let's not merge the commit from bitcoin/bitcoin#11426 if it isn't merged upstream to simplify rebases.

@jtimon jtimon added the 0.14.1 label Oct 10, 2017
@jtimon
Copy link
Contributor Author

jtimon commented Mar 29, 2018

close like bitcoin/bitcoin#11426

@jtimon jtimon closed this Mar 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant