Dev 1806: Fix invalid schemas + add Sandbox Simulations endpoint for transfer processing#38
Dev 1806: Fix invalid schemas + add Sandbox Simulations endpoint for transfer processing#38ShreyaThapa merged 5 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
| example: processor-sandbox-plaidauth-123456 | ||
| bankAccountType: | ||
| type: string | ||
| enum: [checking, savings, general-ledger, loan] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Removed these types because they aren't supported when adding banks via Plaid.
| example: https://api-sandbox.dwolla.com/on-demand-authorizations/30e7c028-0bdf-e511-80de-0aa34a9b2388 | ||
| bankAccountType: | ||
| type: string | ||
| enum: [checking, savings, general-ledger, loan] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same reason as above. Plaid Auth doesn't support Loan accounts.
| @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ | |||
| post: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Adding this endpoint so we can use it in the MCP and SDK.
In the developer-portal, however, if we'd like to hide it from the main reference we could do that using hidden pages.
| - Virtual Account: Creating Virtual Account Numbers (VANs) | ||
| oneOf: | ||
| - $ref: '#/CreateCustomerBankFundingSource' | ||
| - $ref: '#/CreateCustomerBankFundingSourceViaNumbers' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@ShreyaThapa This is minor but is there a better name we could use instead of viaNumbers or ViaPlaid? It's already long, so I wonder if we should just name them:
CreateCustomerBankFundingSourceWithAccountNumbers
CreateCustomerBankFundingSourceWithPlaid
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Absolutely! I'll get that updated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just pushed up a commit resolving this comment - 01a6879
2 participants
No description provided.