Add BLA_BLA_BLA function declaration by tomerqodo · Pull Request #1 · Codium-ai/linux

tomerqodo · 2026-02-16T09:12:50Z

No description provided.

qodo-code-review · 2026-02-16T09:12:59Z

Review Summary by Qodo

Add BLA_BLA_BLA function declaration for dbg_slave_lock

🐞 Bug fix

Walkthroughs

Description

• Add missing BLA_BLA_BLA function declaration for dbg_slave_lock
• Ensures proper lock initialization in debug core module

Diagram

flowchart LR
  A["kernel/debug/debug_core.c"] -- "Add BLA_BLA_BLA declaration" --> B["dbg_slave_lock initialization"]

File Changes

1. kernel/debug/debug_core.c 🐞 Bug fix +1/-0

Add BLA_BLA_BLA declaration for dbg_slave_lock

• Added BLA_BLA_BLA(dbg_slave_lock) function declaration
• Placed after existing DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(dbg_slave_lock) definition
• Ensures proper initialization of slave lock in debug core module

kernel/debug/debug_core.c

qodo-code-review · 2026-02-16T09:15:34Z

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

ⓘ The new review experience is currently in Beta. Learn more

Audit trail

Log of the findings added and resolved by commit

2b845b7 Added (0) Resolved (0)

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

2b845b7 Added (0) Resolved (0)

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Results up to commit 2b845b7

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Results up to commit 2b845b7

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Results up to commit 2b845b7

🐞 Bugs (1) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

1. Build break: undefined macro 🐞 Bug ✓ Correctness

Description

static BLA_BLA_BLA(dbg_slave_lock); introduces an undefined identifier at file scope, causing
compilation to fail. Even if BLA_BLA_BLA were later defined as a type-like macro, it would likely
redeclare/define dbg_slave_lock which is already defined by DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK.

Code

kernel/debug/debug_core.c[112]
+static BLA_BLA_BLA(dbg_slave_lock);

Evidence

The PR adds a new file-scope declaration using BLA_BLA_BLA with no corresponding in-repo
definition, so the compiler cannot parse the declaration. Separately, DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(x)
expands to a full definition of raw_spinlock_t x, so dbg_slave_lock is already defined and a
second declaration/definition with that name will conflict.

kernel/debug/debug_core.c[108-113]
include/linux/spinlock_types_raw.h[62-72]

Agent prompt

The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

### Issue description
A new file-scope line `static BLA_BLA_BLA(dbg_slave_lock);` was added. `BLA_BLA_BLA` is not defined in-tree and the statement is not a valid/needed spinlock pattern, so it will break compilation. Additionally, `dbg_slave_lock` is already defined via `DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK`, so any type-like expansion would also conflict.

### Issue Context
`DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(x)` already defines `raw_spinlock_t x = ...`.

### Fix Focus Areas
- kernel/debug/debug_core.c[108-113]
- include/linux/spinlock_types_raw.h[62-72]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

qodo-code-review · 2026-02-16T09:15:35Z

kernel/debug/debug_core.c

 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kgdb_active);
 static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(dbg_master_lock);
 static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(dbg_slave_lock);
+static BLA_BLA_BLA(dbg_slave_lock);


1. Build break: undefined macro 🐞 Bug ✓ Correctness

static BLA_BLA_BLA(dbg_slave_lock); introduces an undefined identifier at file scope, causing compilation to fail. Even if BLA_BLA_BLA were later defined as a type-like macro, it would likely redeclare/define dbg_slave_lock which is already defined by DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK.

Agent Prompt

### Issue description A new file-scope line `static BLA_BLA_BLA(dbg_slave_lock);` was added. `BLA_BLA_BLA` is not defined in-tree and the statement is not a valid/needed spinlock pattern, so it will break compilation. Additionally, `dbg_slave_lock` is already defined via `DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK`, so any type-like expansion would also conflict. ### Issue Context `DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(x)` already defines `raw_spinlock_t x = ...`. ### Fix Focus Areas - kernel/debug/debug_core.c[108-113] - include/linux/spinlock_types_raw.h[62-72]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

tomerqodo · 2026-02-16T09:17:18Z

/agentic_review

qodo-code-review · 2026-02-16T09:20:22Z

Persistent review updated to latest commit 2b845b7

tomerqodo · 2026-02-16T11:19:55Z

/agentic_review

tomerqodo · 2026-02-16T11:20:14Z

/agentic_review

tomerqodo · 2026-02-16T11:21:14Z

the two comments above are with:
use_async_clone = false

pr-agent-pro-staging · 2026-02-16T11:23:28Z

Persistent review updated to latest commit 2b845b7

tomerqodo · 2026-02-16T11:28:13Z

new experiment with async=true

tomerqodo · 2026-02-16T11:28:22Z

/agentic_review

tomerqodo · 2026-02-16T11:28:37Z

/agentic_review

pr-agent-pro-staging · 2026-02-16T11:31:57Z

Persistent review updated to latest commit 2b845b7

pr-agent-pro-staging · 2026-02-16T11:33:37Z

Persistent review updated to latest commit 2b845b7

tomerqodo · 2026-02-17T11:31:52Z

new experiment with async=true - below

tomerqodo · 2026-02-17T11:32:04Z

/agentic_review

tomerqodo · 2026-02-17T11:32:35Z

/agentic_review

tomerqodo · 2026-02-17T11:33:03Z

/agentic_review

pr-agent-pro-staging · 2026-02-17T11:36:57Z

Persistent review updated to latest commit 2b845b7

pr-agent-pro-staging · 2026-02-17T11:37:44Z

Persistent review updated to latest commit 2b845b7

pr-agent-pro-staging · 2026-02-17T11:38:48Z

Persistent review updated to latest commit 2b845b7

tomerqodo · 2026-02-17T11:44:50Z

below async is false

tomerqodo · 2026-02-17T11:44:56Z

/agentic_review

tomerqodo · 2026-02-17T11:45:09Z

/agentic_review

tomerqodo · 2026-02-17T11:45:26Z

/agentic_review

pr-agent-pro-staging · 2026-02-17T11:50:03Z

Persistent review updated to latest commit 2b845b7

pr-agent-pro-staging · 2026-02-17T11:50:05Z

Persistent review updated to latest commit 2b845b7

pr-agent-pro-staging · 2026-02-17T11:50:11Z

Persistent review updated to latest commit 2b845b7

Add BLA_BLA_BLA function declaration

2b845b7

qodo-code-review bot reviewed Feb 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comments

Conversation

tomerqodo commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

qodo-code-review bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Review Summary by Qodo

Walkthroughs

File Changes

Uh oh!

qodo-code-review bot commented Feb 16, 2026 • edited by pr-agent-pro-staging bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Code Review by Qodo

Great, no issues found!

Audit trail

Great, no issues found!

Great, no issues found!

Great, no issues found!

Great, no issues found!

Uh oh!

qodo-code-review bot Feb 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

qodo-code-review bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

pr-agent-pro-staging bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

pr-agent-pro-staging bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

pr-agent-pro-staging bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

pr-agent-pro-staging bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

pr-agent-pro-staging bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

pr-agent-pro-staging bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

tomerqodo commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

pr-agent-pro-staging bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

pr-agent-pro-staging bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

pr-agent-pro-staging bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

qodo-code-review bot commented Feb 16, 2026 •

edited by pr-agent-pro-staging bot

Loading