Skip to content

Conversation

@mvaios
Copy link

@mvaios mvaios commented May 14, 2019

I think you meant to raise the fitness to the power of two and not the opposite.
i might be wrong though.

@GypsyDangerous
Copy link
Member

GypsyDangerous commented Oct 21, 2019

I believe that Dan intended it to be 2^fitness because 2^x increases faster than x^2 which means that agents that do good do ALOT better than agents that do bad. am I right @shiffman

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants