Add out of box support for Rocky Linux #205
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Assume the type should be "Local OVAL" similarly to AlmaLinux.
Contributor
|
Hi, no that Alma shouldn't be with RHEL becasue it has its own OVAL right now. I will fix it in DefaultConfig. I didn't know that Rocky published its own OVALs. I just swiflty tried it, but pakiti has some errors reading it, but as soon as I will find out where is the problem it will be added here. |
Contributor
Author
The same 2 lines also include Rocky Linux that this PR seeks to address.
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #204.
Add Rocky Linux 8 and 9 OS string and OVAL URLs.
Currently untested.
I notice that in
DefaultConfig.phphttps://github.com/CESNET/pakiti-server/blob/master/src/common/DefaultConfig.php#L147 there is a regex for RHEL that includes all variants, including AlmaLinux that already has the 2 changes included in this PR.Wondering if that is normal or should AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux be removed from lines 147-148 if they are handled individually later in the same file?