Skip to content

Comments

Create codeql-analysis.yml#31

Merged
naheel0 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
codeQL
Feb 16, 2026
Merged

Create codeql-analysis.yml#31
naheel0 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
codeQL

Conversation

@naheel0
Copy link
Member

@naheel0 naheel0 commented Feb 16, 2026

🚀 BΞYTΞFLʘW | Pull Request Protocol

PR Type: (Choose one: feat | fix | refactor | docs | perf)
Issue Link: Fixes #


📝 System Summary

Provide a concise brief of the changes introduced to the stream.

🛠️ Technical Changes

  • Logic change in ...
  • New UI component added: ...
  • Database schema updated: ...

🧪 Quality Assurance (QA)

  • Linting: Code style matches the BeyteFlow grid.
  • Build: npm run build executed without errors.
  • Testing: New logic has been verified and tested.
  • Dark Mode: UI is high-contrast and neon-optimized.

🖼️ Visual Evidence

If this PR affects the UI, drop a screenshot or GIF below:


📡 Developer Authorization

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • My changes generate no new warnings in the console.
  • I have updated the documentation (if applicable).

Authorized by: @naheel0
Timestamp: {{ 16/2/2026 }}


@naheel0 naheel0 requested a review from adithyanmkd as a code owner February 16, 2026 07:28
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 16, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
readme-gen-ai Ready Ready Preview, Comment Feb 16, 2026 7:38am

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 16, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added an automated CodeQL security analysis workflow that runs on pushes to main and on pull requests targeting main.
    • The workflow performs CodeQL analysis for JavaScript repositories on a Linux runner, with the required repository and security-event permissions to detect potential issues early in CI.

Walkthrough

Adds a GitHub Actions workflow that runs CodeQL analysis for JavaScript on pushes to main and pull requests targeting main; it checks out the repo, initializes CodeQL for JavaScript, runs autobuild, and executes the analysis on an ubuntu-latest runner with scoped permissions.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub Actions CodeQL Workflow
​.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml
Added new CodeQL analysis workflow configured for the JavaScript language, triggering on pushes to main and pull requests targeting main; includes checkout, CodeQL init, autobuild, and analysis steps with contents: read and security-events: write permissions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant GH as GitHub
    participant Runner as ubuntu-latest Runner
    participant CodeQL as CodeQL Action

    Dev->>GH: push / open PR to main
    GH->>Runner: trigger workflow (checkout)
    Runner->>CodeQL: init CodeQL (language: javascript)
    Runner->>Runner: autobuild
    Runner->>CodeQL: run CodeQL analysis
    CodeQL->>GH: upload results (security-events)
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • adithyanmkd

Poem

🐰 I hopped in with a CI cheer,

Scanning JavaScript far and near,
CodeQL sniffed out what hid away,
My paws did tap — the checks now play,
A safer branch for devs today 🥕

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive The description is a template with placeholders and does not provide meaningful information about the actual changes made in this pull request. Replace the PR template with a concise description of what the CodeQL workflow does and why it was added.
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Create codeql-analysis.yml' accurately describes the main change: adding a new GitHub Actions CodeQL workflow file.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Merge Conflict Detection ✅ Passed ✅ No merge conflicts detected when merging into main

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codeQL

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml:
- Around line 23-24: Replace the deprecated actions/checkout@v3 usage with
actions/checkout@v4 in the workflow to ensure the action runs on a supported
Node.js version; locate the checkout step that currently references "uses:
actions/checkout@v3" and update it to "uses: actions/checkout@v4", then run a
quick lint/CI to verify actionlint no longer flags the workflow.
- Around line 18-20: The matrix in the CodeQL workflow uses duplicate language
entries causing redundant analysis; update the strategy.matrix.language (the
language array under strategy -> matrix) to remove the "typescript" entry and
keep only "javascript" so CodeQL's javascript extractor handles both JS and TS,
ensuring the workflow runs a single analysis pass.

@naheel0 naheel0 merged commit 842dc2e into main Feb 16, 2026
7 checks passed
@naheel0 naheel0 deleted the codeQL branch February 16, 2026 07:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant