Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade @genkit-ai/core from 0.5.17 to 0.9.1#8

Open
mysommer wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-a806d55a77cc301ee9bf274126fc5473
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade @genkit-ai/core from 0.5.17 to 0.9.1#8
mysommer wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-a806d55a77cc301ee9bf274126fc5473

Conversation

@mysommer
Copy link
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • samples/prompts/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Race Condition
SNYK-JS-GENKITAICORE-12671226
  115  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Race Condition

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @bysnet, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to improve the project's security by updating a critical dependency, @genkit-ai/core, to a newer version. This update specifically resolves a high-severity race condition vulnerability, ensuring the application remains robust against known security threats.

Highlights

  • Dependency Upgrade: The @genkit-ai/core dependency has been upgraded from version 0.5.17 to 0.9.1.
  • Security Vulnerability Fixed: This upgrade resolves a high-severity "Race Condition" vulnerability (SNYK-JS-GENKITAICORE-12671226).
  • Automated Security Fix: This pull request was automatically generated by Snyk to implement the necessary security update.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@bito-code-review
Copy link

Bito Automatic Review Skipped - Files Excluded

Bito didn't auto-review this change because all changed files are in the exclusion list for automatic reviews. No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. Otherwise, to manually trigger a review, type /review in a comment and save.
You can change the excluded files settings here, or contact your Bito workspace admin at i@michaelsommer.dev.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request from Snyk upgrades @genkit-ai/core to fix a security vulnerability. While addressing the vulnerability is important, this automated upgrade only targets a single package. The version jump from 0.5.x to 0.9.x is significant and likely contains breaking changes. The other @genkit-ai packages in package.json remain at version 0.5.10, which will likely cause compatibility issues and break the application. I have added a critical comment recommending that all @genkit-ai dependencies be updated to compatible versions to ensure the project's stability.

"dependencies": {
"@genkit-ai/ai": "^0.5.10",
"@genkit-ai/core": "^0.5.10",
"@genkit-ai/core": "^0.9.1",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

While this change upgrades @genkit-ai/core to fix a security vulnerability, it's likely to introduce breaking changes. The other @genkit-ai/* packages are still on version ^0.5.10, which may not be compatible with @genkit-ai/core@^0.9.1.

Since this is a significant version jump (from 0.5.x to 0.9.x), which often includes breaking changes for 0.x libraries, it's highly recommended to update all @genkit-ai packages to maintain compatibility and prevent potential build or runtime errors.

I suggest updating all related packages to a consistent and compatible version. For example:

"dependencies": {
  "@genkit-ai/ai": "^0.9.1",
  "@genkit-ai/core": "^0.9.1",
  "@genkit-ai/dotprompt": "^0.9.1",
  "@genkit-ai/flow": "^0.9.1",
  "@genkit-ai/googleai": "^0.9.1",
  ...
}

Please verify the latest compatible versions for these packages and update them accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants