[Snyk] Fix for 1 vulnerabilities

[B-T11]

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

• package.json
• package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

	Issue	Score
	Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling SNYK-JS-UNDICI-14943963	551

---

Important

• Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
• Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
• This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

---

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic

---

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @B-T11, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, aims to enhance the project's security posture by resolving a critical vulnerability. It achieves this by updating key @actions dependencies to their latest versions, ensuring the project benefits from the most recent security patches and improvements.

Highlights

• Dependency Updates: Several @actions dependencies, including @actions/cache, @actions/http-client, and @actions/tool-cache, have been upgraded to their latest major versions.
• Security Vulnerability Fix: This PR addresses a medium-severity vulnerability, "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling" (SNYK-JS-UNDICI-14943963), by updating the affected packages.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codacy-production]

Codacy's Analysis Summary

2 new issues (≤ 0 issue)
1 new security issue
0 complexity
0 duplications

Review Pull Request in Codacy →

✨ AI Reviewer available: add the codacy-review label to get contextual insights without leaving GitHub.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, updates several @actions dependencies to new major versions to fix a security vulnerability in undici. While this is a necessary change, the updated packages (@actions/cache, @actions/http-client, @actions/tool-cache) now have dependencies on newer major versions of other @actions packages like @actions/core, @actions/exec, and @actions/io. This will lead to multiple versions of these packages being included in your project, which can increase bundle size and potentially cause runtime issues. I've added a suggestion to update these other dependencies to align their versions and avoid duplication.

[gemini-code-assist]

The updated dependencies (@actions/cache@5, @actions/tool-cache@3) now require newer major versions of other @actions packages (@actions/core@2, @actions/exec@2, @actions/io@2). To avoid including multiple major versions of these packages in your node_modules, which increases bundle size and can lead to unexpected behavior, it's best to update them all together. I'm suggesting updating @actions/core, @actions/exec, and @actions/io to their latest major versions to match the new requirements.

Suggested change

	"@actions/cache": "^5.0.0",
	"@actions/core": "^1.11.1",
	"@actions/exec": "^1.1.1",
	"@actions/glob": "^0.5.0",
	"@actions/http-client": "^2.2.1",
	"@actions/http-client": "^3.0.2",
	"@actions/io": "^1.0.2",
	"@actions/tool-cache": "^2.0.2",
	"@actions/tool-cache": "^3.0.0",
	"@actions/cache": "^5.0.0",
	"@actions/core": "^2.0.0",
	"@actions/exec": "^2.0.0",
	"@actions/glob": "^0.5.0",
	"@actions/http-client": "^3.0.2",
	"@actions/io": "^2.0.0",
	"@actions/tool-cache": "^3.0.0",