Tonytang/mcp #8714

anthony0t · 2026-01-21T23:15:56Z

Commit Type

feature - New functionality
fix - Bug fix
refactor - Code restructuring without behavior change
perf - Performance improvement
docs - Documentation update
test - Test-related changes
chore - Maintenance/tooling

Risk Level

Low - Minor changes, limited scope
Medium - Moderate changes, some user impact
High - Major changes, significant user/system impact

What & Why

Impact of Change

Users:
Developers:
System:

Test Plan

Unit tests added/updated
E2E tests added/updated
Manual testing completed
Tested in:

Contributors

Screenshots/Videos

github-actions · 2026-01-21T23:16:50Z

🤖 AI PR Validation Report

PR Review Results

Thank you for your submission! Here's detailed feedback on your PR title and body compliance:

❌ PR Title

Current: Tonytang/mcp
Issue: Title is non-descriptive and looks like a branch name. It doesn't explain what the change does or which area it affects (UI, MCP servers, wizard, connections, tests, etc.).
Recommendation: Use a short, informative title that summarizes the primary change. Example: Add MCP servers & tool wizard: browse/invoke MCP servers, connections and tool selection

❌ Commit Type

No commit type checkbox selected in the PR body.
Note: Please select exactly one commit type. Based on the diff, this is a new feature: choose feature - New functionality.

❌ Risk Level

Assessment: Missing/unchecked in PR body and there is no risk label on the PR of the form risk:low|medium|high.
Advised Risk: HIGH — this PR introduces a large feature surface (MCP servers browse, MCP tool wizard, connection handling, many new components and selectors, multiple new tests and query logic). The diff shows ~5224 additions, 74 deletions across ~32 files which touches UI, state, queries, and connection services. That breadth increases the chance of runtime regressions and integration issues (auth/connection flows, dynamic values, tool invocation).
Recommendation: Add a matching label to the PR (e.g., risk:high) and update the Risk Level section in the PR body to High - Major changes, significant user/system impact.

❌ What & Why

Current: The PR body contains the template but the What & Why section is empty.
Issue: Required brief context is missing. Reviewers and release managers need a short description of the change and the motivation.
Recommendation: Provide a concise summary (2–4 sentences). Example:
- What: "Introduce MCP servers browsing and a MCP Tool Wizard to let users discover MCP servers, create/select connections and pick allowed tools/headers for invoking MCP-based tools."
- Why: "Add support for invoking external Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and provide a guided wizard for connection creation and parameter selection."

❌ Impact of Change

Issue: Impact section is empty.
Recommendation: Fill these three bullets based on the actual changes:
- Users: Adds UI for browsing MCP servers, creating/selecting MCP connections, selecting tools, and specifying headers. Users will see new categories (MCP servers) and flows in the action/trigger panel.
- Developers: Adds new selectors, state (mcpToolWizard), Redux actions/reducers, queries (useMcpServersQuery, useMcpServersQuery), new components (McpServersBrowse, McpToolWizard) and many unit tests. Calls to connector services and connection creation flow are introduced/modified.
- System: New network calls for MCP server discovery and dynamic list values; additional tests and new query keys may affect caching and CI time. Consider load on search service and authorization surface for managed vs builtin MCP flows.

⚠️ Test Plan

Assessment: The PR body Test Plan checkboxes are empty, however the code diff contains many new test files (unit tests) under libs/**/test directories. This is good, but the PR body should explicitly indicate what tests were added/updated.
Recommendation: Update the Test Plan checkboxes in the PR body to reflect reality. At minimum:
- Unit tests added/updated — list key test files (e.g., libs/designer-ui/.../test/.spec.ts, libs/designer-v2/.../test/.spec.ts, libs/logic-apps-shared/.../tests/connection.spec.ts)
- E2E tests added/updated — only if you added integration/e2e suites (not present in diff)
- Manual testing completed — add a brief note describing manual steps you used (open panel, browse MCP servers, create connection, select tools, add operation, etc.) and which environments were used (local/CI).

Also run the full test suite and add results or a note if any failures are known and being addressed.

⚠️ Contributors

Assessment: Empty. It's OK for this to be blank, but please remember to credit PMs/Designers/Reviewers if appropriate.
Recommendation: Add any contributors so credits are tracked.

⚠️ Screenshots/Videos

Assessment: Not provided. This is optional, but since this PR adds UI flow (wizard, tabs), screenshots or a short video walkthrough will help reviewers quickly validate UX changes.
Recommendation: Add screenshots for the new MCP browse UI and the wizard (Connection step, Create Connection step, Parameters step) or a short recording showing the flow.

Summary Table

Section	Status	Recommendation
Title	❌	Use a descriptive title, e.g. `Add MCP servers & tool wizard: browse/invoke MCP servers, connections, and tool selection`
Commit Type	❌	Select one (likely `feature`) and update PR body
Risk Level	❌	Mark `High` in body and add label `risk:high` on PR (advised: High due to breadth & cross-cutting changes)
What & Why	❌	Add short summary and motivation (2–4 sentences)
Impact of Change	❌	Fill out Users/Developers/System impact bullets
Test Plan	⚠️	Mark Unit tests added/updated and describe manual testing steps; attach test run summary
Contributors	⚠️	Add contributors if applicable
Screenshots/Videos	⚠️	Add screenshots/video for UI changes (recommended)

Final message
Please update the PR title and body with the recommended changes above and add a risk label (e.g., risk:high). Specifically:

Update the PR title to a clear description (see suggestion).
Select a commit type (feature) in the PR body.
Set Risk Level to High in the PR body and add a risk:high label to the PR.
Complete the What & Why and Impact of Change sections using the guidance above.
Update Test Plan checkboxes to show Unit tests were added and provide a short summary of manual test steps and CI results.
Add contributors and screenshots/videos if possible.

Notes about risk: I assessed this PR as HIGH risk because it introduces many new files and changes across UI, state, queries, connection handling, and services (diff shows ~5224 additions, 74 deletions, 32 changed files). If you intended this to be lower impact, please call out the specific mitigations (feature flags, gradual rollout, extensive unit/E2E coverage and passing CI) and consider splitting the PR into smaller focused PRs (e.g., pure tests, backend connection service changes, UI components) to reduce review and release risk.