Coping Strategies and Resilience Among Displaced Youth in Bidibidi Settlement
*Data provided upon reasonable request
🧩 Problem Statement / Background
Displaced youth in refugee settlements face immense psychological stressors. This study investigates how different coping mechanisms—problem-focused, emotion-focused, social support, and spiritual practices—predict resilience among adolescents and young adults in Bidibidi, Uganda. The goal is to identify actionable psychosocial levers for improving mental health in protracted displacement contexts.
⸻
🛠️ Methods Used • Tool: R (v4.4.1) • Packages: MASS, brant, car, ordinal, ggplot2, sjPlot, among others • Statistical Models: • Proportional-odds ordinal logistic regression • Brant test for proportionality assumption • QR decomposition for rank diagnostics • Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) for multicollinearity • Data Management: • Row-wise total scoring of five validated scales • Categorical recoding for demographics • Sample restricted to 108 participants with complete cases
⸻
📈 Key Findings • Strongest predictors of resilience: • Social Support Coping (OR = 1.44; p < 0.001) • Spiritual Practices (OR = 1.15; p = 0.005) • Non-significant predictors: • Emotion-Focused Coping • Problem-Focused Coping (positive trend) • Vulnerability flag: • Youth aged 25+ had significantly lower resilience (OR = 0.15; p = 0.003)
Visuals: • 📊 Figure 1: Forest plot of ORs and 95% CIs
• 📈 Figure 2: Calibration plot showing excellent model reliability across all risk deciles
3. Open & Run
• Open PCMR.Rmd in RStudio
• Click “Knit” to produce a full HTML report, or run chunks manually
• Ensure the dataset (likely named df2 or similar) is loaded correctly
4. Expected Outputs:
• Regression tables for ordinal logistic model
• Diagnostic results (Brant test, VIF)
• Descriptive summaries of all scales
• Forest and calibration plots for model interpretability
5. Data Notes:
• Data was cleaned and preprocessed in R
• All participants had complete scores on 5 coping/resilience scales
• Demographics recoded for analytic clarity (e.g., Age: 18–24 vs. 25+)