Skip to content

Conversation

@Barthelemy
Copy link
Collaborator

  • added initialization of IL
  • set the run number whenever we get one

@Barthelemy Barthelemy changed the title [QC-1292] Missing run number in logs from BookkeepingSink [WIP] [QC-1292] Missing run number in logs from BookkeepingSink Jun 5, 2025
@Barthelemy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wip because I don't know how to test

}
if (!runNumber.has_value()) {
runNumber = flagCollection->getRunNumber();
QcInfoLogger::setRun(runNumber.value());
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is quite late to set the run number. send happens only at the end of run. Would you be able to retrieve run number during start of run as a fairmq property, similarly to other Runners?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, this is a fair point. I wanted to be consistent with what we pass to the BK but it makes more sense like that.

@knopers8
Copy link
Collaborator

wip because I don't know how to test

add a valid bookkeeping URL to a QC config file and add "exportToBookkeeping" : "true" for at least one check.

@Barthelemy Barthelemy changed the title [WIP] [QC-1292] Missing run number in logs from BookkeepingSink [QC-1292] Missing run number in logs from BookkeepingSink Jun 27, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@knopers8 knopers8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@knopers8 knopers8 merged commit c617feb into AliceO2Group:master Nov 4, 2025
6 checks passed
akavumpa pushed a commit to akavumpa/QualityControl that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
…up#2561)

* [QC-1292] Missing run number in logs from BookkeepingSink

- added initialization of IL
- set the run number whenever we get one

* set the run number at start of run using the fairmq property

* rebase
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants