Skip to content

Conversation

@Tjorven-Liebe
Copy link

Warning: This is untested cuz i don't care..
Whoever wants to try do it but I don't know why this shouldn't work..

However this is the code.

@Amgelo563
Copy link

There's no need to encrypt the message being sent as the packet can be intercepted at the proxy level, which is what Ajneb's current fix (pending to be pushed) is.

@Tjorven-Liebe
Copy link
Author

I am not encrypting the packet. Instead i added a key function. Plugins that use the channel then need to provide the key defined in the config to use the Action

@Amgelo563
Copy link

Still, the best way is to simply ignore it directly instead of relying in a secret. A fix has been pushed that does that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants