This is a live coding interview evaluating four core competencies:
- System design thinking and communication (Part 1)
- Implementation skills - writing clean, functional code (Part 2)
- Code review skills - identifying security and data issues (Part 3)
- Orchestration design - building production-ready workflows (Part 4)
Setup: You may use the internet, documentation, and AI assistants as you normally would while coding.
⚠️ NOTE TO INTERVIEWEE: Complete this entire discussion section before moving to Part 2 (Implementation).
Business stakeholders are asking for data from Aviation Stack to be available via internal self-service BI tooling. This data will allow for performance tracking and monitoring of our different airline partners.
Context: You're joining an existing data team. We already have:
- Airflow for orchestration
- Snowflake as our data warehouse
- dbt for transformations
- GCS for staging/raw data storage
- Looker for BI (connected to Snowflake)
Walk us through how you would approach this request.
Think through the entire lifecycle: from gathering requirements, to designing the architecture, to implementing and operationalizing the pipeline.
We're interested in understanding:
- Your thought process and how you break down ambiguous problems
- What questions you'd ask stakeholders and why
- Which high-level architecture you'd choose
- What technical tradeoffs you'd consider
- How you'd ensure this runs reliably in production
This is an open conversation. We're evaluating your communication, critical thinking, and how you approach real-world data engineering problems.
Implement the API extraction function in src/aviation_stack.py:
- Write a function to fetch flight data from the AviationStack Flights API
- Extract these fields for end users:
flight_date,flight_status,departure airport,arrival airport,airline_name - Return the data in a format suitable for downstream storage (JSON or structured dict/list)
- Handle API errors appropriately
- Note: You can use a free API key or mock the response - just document your choice
Success criteria:
- Function is callable and returns structured data
- Code handles basic error cases
- Code is readable with appropriate variable names
Review the existing code in src/snowflake.py. This module contains intentional issues that a senior engineer should identify.
Tasks:
- Identify problems in the implementation (security, correctness, efficiency, best practices)
- Document your findings - add comments directly in the code explaining what's wrong
- Fix any critical issue - Address at least 1 critical issue
What we're looking for:
- Do you understand idempotency and how to implement it?
- Can you prioritize critical vs. minor issues?
Note: src/gcs.py also has issues, but focus on snowflake.py for time constraints.
In dags/flight_data.py, implement a production-ready Airflow DAG that orchestrates the complete pipeline.
Requirements:
- Create the DAG with appropriate schedule, retries, and configuration
- Implement these tasks:
extract_flight_data- Call your aviation_stack.py functionupload_to_gcs- Save data to GCS with date-based partitioningload_to_snowflake- Load from GCS to Snowflake (using your idempotent approach)run_dbt- Trigger dbt models
- Define task dependencies clearly
- Add appropriate error handling - What happens if the API fails? If Snowflake is down?
- Include data quality checks - At least one validation step
Success criteria:
- DAG is syntactically correct (or close enough to be runnable with minor fixes)
- Task dependencies are logical and correct
- Shows understanding of Airflow best practices (task isolation, XCom, etc.)
- Demonstrates production thinking (retries, timeouts, failure handling)
Hints:
- Use
PythonOperatoror@taskdecorator for custom tasks - Use
BashOperatorfor dbt or considerDbtCloudRunJobOperator - Think about how to pass data between tasks (XCom vs. external storage)
- Consider using Airflow connections for credentials
Be prepared to discuss:
- What would you add with more time?
- How would you monitor this pipeline in production?
- What data quality checks would you implement?
- How would you handle schema changes in the API?
| Part | Duration | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Architecture Discussion | 10 min | Requirements, tradeoffs, system design |
| 2. API Implementation | 15 min | Writing clean code with error handling |
| 3. Code Review | 10 min | Identifying security/correctness issues |
| 4. Airflow DAG | 20 min | Production-ready orchestration |
| 5. Wrap-up | 5 min | Production concerns & extensions |
| Total | 60 min |