-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
Drop lodash #89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Drop lodash #89
Conversation
9f23922 to
033e75c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other comments (4)
- src/transformations/compress.js (73-73) The change from `_.isEmpty(props.options)` to `props.options.length === 0` assumes that `props.options` is always an array. If `props.options` could be undefined, null, or an object in some cases, this change might introduce bugs. Consider adding a check to ensure `props.options` is an array or has a length property before accessing it.
- src/transformations/validate.js (91-91) The replacement of `_.isEmpty(props.hostnames)` with `!props.hostnames?.length` is close but not exactly equivalent. While it handles null/undefined cases correctly with the optional chaining, an empty array would evaluate to `length === 0` which is falsy. However, if you want to be more explicit, you could use `!props.hostnames || props.hostnames.length === 0`.
-
src/index.js (57-57)
For consistency with the other property checks, consider using optional chaining here as well:
if (source.name?.length > 0) { -
src/index.js (57-57)
For consistency with how other properties are checked, consider simplifying this to match the pattern used elsewhere:
if (source.name?.length) {
💡 To request another review, post a new comment with "/windsurf-review".
| if (_.startsWith(toTest, '://')) { | ||
| toTest = _.trimStart(toTest, '://'); | ||
| if (toTest.startsWith('://')) { | ||
| toTest = toTest.replace('://', ''); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The replacement of _.trimStart(toTest, '://') with toTest.replace('://', '') might not be equivalent in all cases. trimStart removes all leading occurrences of the specified characters, while replace only replaces the first occurrence. Consider using toTest.substring(3) instead for a more direct replacement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is equivalent. We already know that :// is always at the start (that's what .startsWith(://) for). So, it will always replace the leading one.
Also, unlike .slice(3), .replace() prevents string CoW inside Node.js v8, which helps release memory pressure by allowing old strings to be GCed from the memory (.slice() holds the reference of the original string, preventing that from being GCed).
| for (let i = filtered.length - 1; i >= 0; i -= 1) { | ||
| const isValidRule = valid(filtered[i], this.allowedIP); | ||
| const isCommentOrEmptyLine = ruleUtils.isComment(filtered[i]) || _.isEmpty(filtered[i]); | ||
| const isCommentOrEmptyLine = ruleUtils.isComment(filtered[i]) || filtered[i].length === 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The replacement of _.isEmpty(filtered[i]) with filtered[i].length === 0 might not handle undefined or null values correctly. Consider using !filtered[i] || filtered[i].length === 0 to maintain the same behavior as lodash's isEmpty.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not necessary. We already know that the filtered is string[], so filtered[i] will never be nullish.
| */ | ||
| function valid(ruleText, allowedIP) { | ||
| if (ruleUtils.isComment(ruleText) || _.isEmpty(_.trim(ruleText))) { | ||
| if (ruleUtils.isComment(ruleText) || ruleText.trim().length === 0) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The replacement of _.isEmpty(_.trim(ruleText)) with ruleText.trim().length === 0 might throw an error if ruleText is undefined or null. Consider using a null check: !ruleText || ruleText.trim().length === 0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We already know that ruleText is a string and will never be falsy.
|
cc @jellizaveta Would you like to review this? |
Drop lodash from
HostslistCompiler.WIP: some unit tests are failing, still figuring out why.All fixed.