Skip to content

Explanation unclear #4

@ajkdrag

Description

@ajkdrag

Hi, I have a doubt regarding this paragraph:

This is now a little weird too, because the algorithm starts and ends with independent updates to the parameters, so going from time t to time t+1 involves two successive parameter updates--why not combine them into one parameter update? We can do this by subtracting mu*m_tm1p1 at the definition of x_t, where m_tm1p1 is m_tm1 at the next timestep t+1, which is obviously m_t at the current timestep:

Can you please elaborate on this? I couldn't understand this step.

Thanks!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions