Skip to content

Provide mocks for imports like autodoc? #49

@rbeyer

Description

@rbeyer

There does not appear to be a way to mock modules imported by programs that autoprogram imports. It would be nice to have a mechanism to mock modules for autoprogram.

During regular development, this isn't a problem. In order to test the code, you need to have everything installed anyway. This is more of an obstacle with documentation systems that use CI resources (e.g. readthedocs.org). If your programs have imports with heavy duty dependencies (modules like gdal/osgeo which has C dependencies), those modules and libraries need to be installed, otherwise the "import" that autoprogram does results in a ModuleNotFoundError. However, in most cases, the function that produces the argument parser that autoprogram needs to deal with probably doesn't rely on those hefty imported modules, and if there was a way to mock them, then they wouldn't need to be installed and/or compiled by CI systems that just build documentation, making documentation development easier, faster, cheaper, and contributing less to the heat death of the planet.

The sphinx.ext.autodoc extension has a autodoc_mock_imports parameter that might be a model (maybe some functions could just be used, since it is always installed with Sphinx?) which allows a user to tell autodoc to mock a set of modules. This means that those modules don't need to be installed into the CI system if it is only building the docs.

Maybe we need an autoprogram_mock_imports parameter?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions