Skip to content

Looking for Support with the correct vignette to follow / contrast setting #117

@Smeerlap

Description

@Smeerlap

Dear developers,

thank you for this amazing tool and the detailed vignettes. I am not a trained bioinformatician, but the vignettes are very easy to follow and I managed to re-create all the plots with my own dataset.

I have worked with scRNAseq data in the past. After reading through and following your vignettes, I am uncertain how to approach my own dataset and was hoping that you could guide me a little bit.

For my project, I am analyzing a mouse snRNAseq dataset with two conditions ("healthy" and "KO") with samples from 4 different timepoints (4, 6, 8 and 12 weeks). We are very interested in how the cellular communication in our disease model changes across time. So I am interested in finding out 1) How communication changes across time in the KO group. 2) If / how these time-dependent changes over time differ between the two groups.

For each condition-age pair (e.g. KO_4w or healthy_12w), I have 2 biological replicates, except for the healthy_8W and the healthy_6W pair, which only contain one biological replicate (therefore, I have a total of 14 samples).

In getting started, I am thinking about two aspects:

  1. If I understand your vignettes correctly, I should follow the "sample-agnostic" workflow (https://github.com/saeyslab/multinichenetr/blob/main/vignettes/basic_analysis_steps_MISC_SACL.knit.md) since my groups all have < 4 biological replicates and pseudobulking might result in misleading results. As it states in the vignette, I cannot perform mutlifactorial experimental designs with this approach.

  2. How do I best set my contrasts to address the biological questions that I have? Is it just not possible to address these questions with my setup (i.e. considering each condition-age pair as a group of interest) because of the limited sample size? Or is there a way to formulate the contrast design to circumvent these issues? Or would you recommend to group the samples more coarsely (e.g. "young" = weeks 4+6 and "old" = weeks 8+12) to increase sample size in each group and then follow the standard pseudobuling vignette?

Sorry for all the questions but as you can probably tell, I am getting a bit lost in all the details and my rather complex experimental setup.

Thanks a lot for your help!

All the best!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions