Order of imports and order of trait bounds

[gsingh93]

I'm not sure if this getting too nitpicky, but should the style guide include suggestions for the order of imports and the order of trait arguments? In my own code, I organize them both alphabetically. It'd be nice to see this in other peoples' code as well.

[nathantypanski]

The current guide suggests order based on qualities of the imports.

Are you suggesting ordering these subsections alphabetically? I think that makes more sense than going alphabetically all-around.

The current standard (specifying higher-level categories but not exact ordering within them) appears to be the direction of Pep8. I personally would prefer to give people the freedom to order subsections on a projecty-by-project basis, rather than specifying it in the guidelines. YMMV.

[gsingh93]

Yea, I was suggesting alphabetically ordering imports inside subsections.

For traits I was thinking this should be considered good style:

fn foo<T: Clone + Default>();

Where as this would be considered bad style:

fn foo<T: Default + Clone>();

I'd like to see more opinions on both of these topics.