Possible to support quickjs and quickjs-ng both instead of the switch?

[barracuda156]

@rkd77 Recent commit switched to quickjs-ng: ce3938b

The issue is that two forks may differ substantially in some scenarios or on some platforms, both in terms of performance (speed) and existing bugs at any given moment (both forks are actively maintained). That may or may not be critical or even noticeable for every user, of course, but can matter for some.

[rkd77]

There is no big difference between them now. Code for quickjs can be added later.

[barracuda156]

I do not closely monitor where they deviate, but this bug is still unfixed in quickjs-ng, I believe: quickjs-ng/quickjs#1122
Could be inconsequential, I have no idea if a browser uses related functionality.