Conflict of interest of the enforcer of the governing equation with p2p practices. #1
Description
It seems probable that the person that enforces the governance equation is also one of the people that works on the specific group.
In case that the activity of the group provides a lot of wealth to its members, that person has an incentive to block people from joining the group. This has the side effect that rejected people could create their own group and compete with the first. This leads to a waste of resources because the second group has to acquire similar capital to work to.
ex. bitcoin exchanges provide a lot of wealth if successful and many people could potentially work there. Its founders certainly won't allow that to happen. If we did have p2p practices in bitcoin exchanges, then the fees would certainly be lower, so that the people that work there get a wage according to their abilities/work and that would dissuade others from requesting to take part in it.
One solution to this problem is we could have the group of custodians of the ovn network transfer the property from one member to another. Because the majority of the remaining members will be working with groups for different sectors of the economy, there is little probability of some of them colliding due to common interests.
I do not know if this is legally possible.