You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I performed whole-genome sequence alignment for 19 species. However, one species has a genome assembly with a BUSCO completeness of only 64%, and two other species have BUSCO completeness of about 89%. Under these circumstances, are the Cactus alignment results reliable? Can they be used for sliding-window phylogenetic analyses, ASTRAL species tree inference, and downstream analyses such as QuIBL?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I performed whole-genome sequence alignment for 19 species. However, one species has a genome assembly with a BUSCO completeness of only 64%, and two other species have BUSCO completeness of about 89%. Under these circumstances, are the Cactus alignment results reliable? Can they be used for sliding-window phylogenetic analyses, ASTRAL species tree inference, and downstream analyses such as QuIBL?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions