Skip to content

[question] Is there any need for a README note about Qt License Agreement (version 4.4.1+) for ecFlow UI? #28

@kinow

Description

@kinow

Hi,

I was reading my news feed this morning when I saw this article “Using Qt 6 under LGPLv3” - https://embeddeduse.com/2023/01/06/using-qt-5-15-and-qt-6-under-lgplv3/

It is written by a consultant that provides services to corporations that include Qt licensing. In this article the author details the differences in the updated Qt license (February 2022), regarding GPL, LGPL, and other commercial Qt licenses.

The part that called my attention in the article was this note:

An application using Qt Commercial must not communicate with any another application using Qt LGPL-3.0 or Qt GPL, if both applications run on the same device. This is more restrictive than GPL.

I had a look at the Qt legal terms and conditions to confirm it. I took these screenshots from the parts I think are related to the author's note.

Screenshot from 2023-01-08 12-12-28

Screenshot from 2023-01-08 12-16-04

Screenshot from 2023-01-08 12-16-35

IANAL, but I think that would imply that if a site using ecflow_ui with Qt must not combine it with any other application built with Qt commercial, under the penalty of having to pay licensing fees to Qt company otherwise. If that's correct, I think it probably deserves a note somewhere in the README file.

Or if that's not the case, either a note anyway in the README file to say why it is OK to combine the licenses, or just close this issue and point it to other users with a similar question 👍

Thank you!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions