Unexpected result from getInputs(do.call(...

[tvarju]

The command CodeDepends::getInputs(quote(do.call(order, temp))) outputs (with deleted empty slots)

An object of class "ScriptNodeInfo"
Slot "inputs":
[1] "order" "temp" 

Slot "functions":
do.call 
     NA 

Slot "code":
do.call(order, temp)

I would have expected

An object of class "ScriptNodeInfo"
Slot "inputs":
[1] "temp" 

Slot "functions":
do.call order 
     NA    NA 

Slot "code":
do.call(order, temp)

[wlandau]

A fair point, but this code analysis is all static. In do.call(order, temp), CodeDepends would need to evaluate the symbol order to know that it is a function and do.call to know that it takes a function as an argument. The same is true for getInputs(quote(vapply(1:10, sqrt, FUN.VALUE = numeric(1))))
and getInputs(quote(purrr::map(1:10, sqrt))). It seems like CodeDepends would need to either evaluate code or look for every special case in order to notice all functions that take functions as arguments, and there are just so many.