Replies: 9 comments 2 replies
-
|
Love these, I think all of these make sense. NLP will definitely support them. For due date picker UI though, not sure yet. I wonder if they will make the UI too complicated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Pinning this discussion item. Let's use this to identify more missing recurring patterns that make sense. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Maybe incorporating a time range where the task can be completed
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
More recurring options is coming in next release (0.5.0). Note this release only covers advanced pattern from GUI, NLP support will come at a later day. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Those recurring options in 0.5.0 are nice. Appreciate the feature set. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Would also be nice to have an option to recur again "x days", "x weeks" etc AFTER completion. For example water plants, if you set it every week and instead of completing on the 7th day you complete it on the 12th day, the next instance of that task will always be 7 days after it is completed, not 2 days later |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is more on the NLP side of things, but considering that we can already type things like "every X months", I think it would be nice to be able to augment it with something like "starting tomorrow" for example to set the starting period rather than it defaulting to today. Currently it's easy enough to open the date picker and do this, but it'd be even more ergonomic to have the smart parsing handle it :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
"starting If you ever add support for end dates for recurring tasks (recurring tasks currently recur indefinitely AFAICT), that could make the pattern language tricky since it could become easy to confuse with due dates. Similarly, perhaps you want the start date of your recurring task to be different from its due date—maybe you've already done the task and are making it retroactively. Though that raises a question: what happens if you give a start date that doesn't agree with the interval based on the end date? Maybe you thought about this already and that's why there aren't end dates (yet) 😄 Overloading the meaning of the "starting" and "ending" pattern sets could potentially add uncertainty; either set could refer to a due date depending on the context. Perhaps in addition to or in lieu of the "ending" pattern set, something like "due Overall, I think there's a balance between flexibility/expressiveness and ambiguity at play with these patterns. Sorry if this isn't the most comprehensible idea dump; I had several thoughts come to me while I was thinking about this. Some of these may be non-issues and I just haven't thought them out enough. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Bumping this, some syntax I'm familiar with and use often:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I really like the options available already, but the custom one could add some more flexibility. Currently it looks like it can just repeat from the date you initially select. It would be nice to choose options like
I don't know how difficult these options would be to implement, but I have seen them in other tools, but those lack at least some of the organization and clean UI of TaskTrove :). I really want to see this project bloom.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions