JOSS review - Title and final ms details

[pabloitu]

There is a missing word in the JOSS paper title. It should read:

floatCSEP: An application to deploy and conduct reproducible, prospective earthquake forecasting experiments

[pabloitu]

@andreww, @sscivier Apologies, but I've noticed a typo in the manuscript's title, where the word "experiments" was missing. Co-authors didn't notice, because we worked on an online text editor where it was well written, but I completely missed it in the markdown. It currently reads:

floatCSEP: An application to deploy and conduct reproducible and prospective earthquake forecasting

When it should have been:

floatCSEP: An application to deploy and conduct reproducible and prospective earthquake forecasting experiments

Moreover, I've noticed it reads much better with a listing to avoid so many "and"s:

floatCSEP: An application to deploy and conduct reproducible, prospective earthquake forecasting experiments

Would you agree with this correction for the title? I hope it doesn't cause problems with the JOSS publishing pipeline.

These changes (along with including all co-authors' ORCID) were included in the #114 PR, whereas in #115 I changed the README.md repo description to be consistent with the proposed manuscript title.

[sscivier]

No worries--that's all fine with me. Not sure if this affects the JOSS process at all, but I'm sure @andreww can answer that. I've just added one question in #114: #114 (comment). Are there any other places/files where this would need changing (e.g., CITATION.cff)? Just double-check to ensure consistency.

[pabloitu]

Thanks! I included the new title in CITATION.cff with #110 and commit 2171cea. Same for README.md with #115 in 9505aaf. Merged both branches, but will wait for @andreww confirmation about fixing the MS title.

[andreww]

Sorry - I was very much offline last week. Yes, no problem from me with the change in title. Once you've changed this in the manuscript markdown it'll be worth asking the editorialbot to regenerate the PDF (add a comment to the review issue that starts with@editorialbot generate pdf). I've asked about the need to update things on the JOSS side (e.g. the issue title) but if that's needed I'll be able to do that.

[pabloitu]

Thank you. Closed with PR #114 and #115