[Question]: Should the tasks include composite tasks?

[Weyaaron]

          > And I am unsure if the movement belongs to the task at all. Maybe its best to stick to the word at the cursor instead of requiring some additional steps.

I see your point. The extension could offer both granular tasks for individual commands and composite tasks for more realistic editing scenarios. I believe navigating to a word and copy it is a fundamental operation in the daily use and lies somewhere in between. We could consider renaming the current task to better reflect its intermediate nature, to address your concerns.

Originally posted by @mertovun in #11 (comment)

I have mixed feelings on this. But I am open to include this example and go from there. One of my concerns is, that the codebase is not designed with composite tasks in mind. Therefore, inclusion of these tasks might prove challenging.