[plan] Fix inconsistencies in partial-review-prompt.md between rules and template

[Tonny-Gu]

Now I understand. The user selected Option 1B in the previous resolve (replacing the quote-based citation format with an Agent Perspectives table reference), but now they're refining that decision: instead of adding a new table definition in Rule 1, just reference the existing Agent Perspectives table that's already defined in the output format template.

Let me produce the updated unified plan:

---

Implementation Plan: Fix Inconsistencies in partial-review-prompt.md

Table of Contents

• Goal
• Codebase Analysis
• Implementation Steps
• Success Criteria
• Risks and Mitigations
• Selection History
• Refine History
• Option Compatibility Check

---

Goal

Fix terminology inconsistencies in partial-review-prompt.md where the rules section and template section use different naming conventions, and replace Rule 1's quote-based citation format with a simple reference to the Agent Perspectives table (already defined in the output format template).

Out of scope:

• Adding conditional HTML comments or mode-specific markers
• Creating new test files
• Adding mode-specific guidance tables
• Restructuring the entire file architecture

Codebase Analysis

File changes:

File	Level	Purpose
.claude-plugin/skills/partial-consensus/partial-review-prompt.md	minor	Fix terminology: "Consensus Assessment" → "Consensus Status" at line 56; fix wording at line 154; simplify Rule 1 to reference existing table format (lines 88-99)
.claude-plugin/skills/partial-consensus/SKILL.md	minor	Fix terminology: "Consensus Assessment" → "Consensus Status" at line 66
tests/lint/test-partial-review-prompt.sh	minor	Update anchor test: #consensus-assessment → #consensus-status at line 24

Implementation Steps

Step 1: Update test file anchor expectation

• File: tests/lint/test-partial-review-prompt.sh
• Changes: Change #consensus-assessment to #consensus-status at line 24

Code Draft

 # Test 2: TOC contains core anchors
 REQUIRED_ANCHORS=(
     "#agent-perspectives-summary"
-    "#consensus-assessment"
+    "#consensus-status"
     "#goal"
     "#implementation-steps"
 )

Step 2: Fix terminology in rules section

• File: .claude-plugin/skills/partial-consensus/partial-review-prompt.md
• Changes: Change "Consensus Assessment" to "Consensus Status" at line 56

Code Draft

   - Include code drafts from the selected options
   - **Skip Disagreement Summary section** (already resolved)
-  - **Skip Consensus Assessment section** (consensus already determined in previous iteration)
+  - **Skip Consensus Status section** (consensus already determined in previous iteration)
   - Include Validation section at the end (see output format below)

Step 3: Fix wording at line 154

• File: .claude-plugin/skills/partial-consensus/partial-review-prompt.md
• Changes: Change "consensus or partial consensus" to "consensus or disagreement" to align with the Consensus Definition section

Code Draft

 ### Unified Output Format

-Use this format for ALL outputs (consensus or partial consensus):
+Use this format for ALL outputs (consensus or disagreement):

Step 4: Simplify Rule 1 to reference existing Agent Perspectives table

• File: .claude-plugin/skills/partial-consensus/partial-review-prompt.md
• Changes: Replace the quote-based code block (lines 88-99) with a simple reference to the Agent Perspectives table already defined in the Disagreement template section of the output format

Code Draft

 ### Rule 1: Cite Both Sides

-When proposals disagree, document both positions before deciding:
-
-```
-### Disagreement: [Topic]
-
-**Bold claims**: [Quote from bold proposal]
-**Paranoia claims**: [Quote from paranoia proposal]
-**Critique says**: [What critique agent found]
-**Resolution**: [Which side is adopted and why, with evidence]
-```
+When proposals disagree, document both positions in the **Agent Perspectives** table
+under each Disagreement section (see output format template below for table structure).

Step 5: Fix SKILL.md terminology

• File: .claude-plugin/skills/partial-consensus/SKILL.md
• Changes: Change "Consensus Assessment" to "Consensus Status" at line 66

Code Draft

 | Section | Description |
 |---------|-------------|
 | Agent Perspectives Summary | 5-agent position table |
-| Consensus Assessment | 3-condition evaluation with PASS/FAIL verdict |
+| Consensus Status | 3-condition evaluation with CONSENSUS/DISAGREEMENT verdict |
 | Goal / Codebase Analysis | Problem statement and file changes |

Step 6: Run lint test to verify changes

• File: tests/lint/test-partial-review-prompt.sh
• Changes: Execute test to confirm all anchors pass

Code Draft

bash tests/lint/test-partial-review-prompt.sh

Success Criteria

• Test tests/lint/test-partial-review-prompt.sh passes
• All instances of "Consensus Assessment" replaced with "Consensus Status"
• Line 154 uses "consensus or disagreement" instead of "consensus or partial consensus"
• Rule 1 simplified to reference existing Agent Perspectives table (no duplicate table definition)

Risks and Mitigations

Risk	Likelihood	Impact	Mitigation
Test fails after changes	L	M	Run test immediately after changes
Missed occurrences of "Consensus Assessment"	L	L	Grep for "Assessment" to verify no other occurrences
Loss of "Resolution" field guidance from Rule 1	M	L	Resolution is implicit in option selection; AI Recommendation field in each Disagreement section serves this purpose

Selection History

Timestamp	Disagreement	Options Summary	Selected Option	User Comments
2026-01-25 22:42	1: Rule 1 Citation Format	1A (Reducers): Keep as-is; 1B (Bold+Paranoia): Replace with table reference	1B

Refine History

Timestamp	Summary
2026-01-25 22:45	Step 4: Remove duplicate table definition, just reference existing Agent Perspectives table in output format

Option Compatibility Check

Status: VALIDATED

All selected options are architecturally compatible. The refinement to Step 4 (removing the duplicate table definition and using a simple reference instead) is consistent with the original Option 1B intent while reducing redundancy.

Applied Selections:

• Option 1B applied: Rule 1's quote-based citation format replaced with reference to Agent Perspectives table

Applied Refinements:

• Step 4 simplified: Instead of defining a new table in Rule 1, reference the existing Agent Perspectives table already defined in the output format template

Plan Completeness:

• All selected options merged into Implementation Steps
• Code drafts from selected options included
• Refinement applied to Step 4
• No orphaned disagreement references remain