Skip to content

ncAA-protein mutageneis scoring #109

@jbailey1933

Description

@jbailey1933

When quantifying the binding energy of a ncAA-protein complex, we observe varying energies for each trial (noise spikes of -0.3 to 0.7 REUs for binding energy & 13 to 21 REUs for folding energy) at a given residue after mutagenesis which doesn’t seem correct given our system.

Our workflow is as follows: we separate a protein-cAA chain, “score” the constituents, mutate the AA to an ncAA & “re-score.” Do you know why we could be experiencing such fluctuations in REUs given the same complex/interface residues? In addition, is there a distinct difference between 2 & 3 or 10 & 20 REUs (same order of magnitude) or can the difference between these be considered negligible where the “trend” is most important given a residue with varying scores when mutated.

Image

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions