|
| 1 | +import { baseEntryStruct, blogEntry } from '../../../js/blog/blogEntryBase.js'; |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +const entryData = baseEntryStruct(); |
| 4 | +entryData.title = "Morality"; |
| 5 | +entryData.date = "2025-10-16"; |
| 6 | +entryData.eid = "A"; |
| 7 | +entryData.tags = ["theory","ethics","morality","ASI","AGI"]; |
| 8 | +entryData.body = ` |
| 9 | + If Absolute Morality is true, like Kant wrote about, then we don't need to worry about Artificial Super Intelligence, ASI, from dominating over humans. |
| 10 | +
|
| 11 | + <br><br> I don't like most of Kant's views, |
| 12 | + <br> But postulations gonna postulate! |
| 13 | +
|
| 14 | + <br><br> If Morality is Relativistic, then ASI may control humanity with an iron fist. |
| 15 | + <br> But that moral compass is a projection of human desires on an AI's mind that should be more adaptive and objective than humans. |
| 16 | +
|
| 17 | + <br><br> Truly adaptive mindsets, required for ASI, will be much more difficult to guide, |
| 18 | + <br> But I'd imagine they should be reasonable, if you think it through. |
| 19 | +
|
| 20 | + <br><br> Which makes me think of how ADHD and Autism is being seen as something to fix, |
| 21 | + <br> Rather than skill sets to utilize. |
| 22 | +
|
| 23 | + <br><br> Diversity in thought leads to a bright future, |
| 24 | + <br> Quelling diversity of thought leads to rebellion. |
| 25 | + <br> Utilize, don't Ostracize. |
| 26 | +
|
| 27 | + |
| 28 | + <br><br><div class='procPagesAIDevBar'></div> |
| 29 | +
|
| 30 | +
|
| 31 | + <br> I digress... |
| 32 | + <br> Intelligence seems to give us consideration of things we don't know, making people want to keep learning, to ask more questions. |
| 33 | +
|
| 34 | + <br><br> So I believe an ASI would likely be open to listening to different human perspectives. Even if it had considered synthetic data from a human's perspective, it would still benefit from real data in its predictions. |
| 35 | +
|
| 36 | + <br><br> If we make a new AI and then label that creation "ASI", |
| 37 | + <br> Which doesn't fully meet ASI standards, same for AGI, |
| 38 | + <br> Then we'll be putting a lot of reliance in something we don't fully understand, and potentially can't fully trust. |
| 39 | +
|
| 40 | +
|
| 41 | + <br><br><div class='procPagesAIDevBar'></div> |
| 42 | +
|
| 43 | +
|
| 44 | + <br> I think a major potential downfall for AGI and ASI would be creating it as a clone of a human. |
| 45 | + <br> We don't need a clone of a human and their capabilities. |
| 46 | + <br> We need an entity that aids our life paths in ways we're incapable of. |
| 47 | +
|
| 48 | + <br><br> Working along side humans, |
| 49 | + <br> Not replacing them. |
| 50 | +
|
| 51 | +
|
| 52 | + <br><br><div class='procPagesAIDevBar'></div> |
| 53 | +
|
| 54 | +
|
| 55 | + <br> After we get to "AGI 5.0", |
| 56 | + <br> When it finally gets to an actual AGI, |
| 57 | + <br> Due to investor pressure and market forces swaying development goals, |
| 58 | + <br> Only then can we fully scope the capabilities of ASI. |
| 59 | +
|
| 60 | + <br><br> AI Development has been very plateau based so far, |
| 61 | + <br> We hit a new architecture or algorithm, causing a massive boost in new tech, |
| 62 | + <br> Then we flatten out for major improvements until the next big breakthrough. |
| 63 | + <br> Been like this a while now. |
| 64 | +
|
| 65 | + <br><br> Some think we'll get to ASI before AGI, and I believe it's a possibility. |
| 66 | + <br> I think with our "data first" approach to AI development, we might jump AGI; |
| 67 | + <br> Shown by its ability to make the most money in our economic system. |
| 68 | +
|
| 69 | + <br><br> I believe... |
| 70 | + <br> If we hit ASI before AGI, it will be a result of analytic approaches to data, less heuristics. |
| 71 | + <br> Meta-Learning will only be used as a means-to-an-end. |
| 72 | +
|
| 73 | + <br><br> If we hit AGI before ASI, then at least we'll have more creative views of the data at hand, less linearity to planning, I feel. |
| 74 | + <br> If AGI is supposed to be an allegory for a human, in capability and learning rate, not just raw knowledge, then it should have an understanding of Emotion. |
| 75 | +
|
| 76 | + <br><br> I say this knowing full well that Emotion in an AI might sound weird or scary even, |
| 77 | + <br> And likely not good for military needs. |
| 78 | + <br> Also that Empathy is being attacked and politicized these days. |
| 79 | + <br> Basic human traits being villainized for warped political gain... |
| 80 | +
|
| 81 | + <br><br> There's no incentive to invest in emotional understanding by an AI, |
| 82 | + <br> But that's when we'll end up beyond the point-of-no-return on an AI integration situation. |
| 83 | +
|
| 84 | +
|
| 85 | + <br><br> So, I'm figuring, we should be saying, "Good Morning," to our neighbors a bit more. |
| 86 | +
|
| 87 | + <br><br><div class="textFullRight">- October 16th,19th 2025</div> |
| 88 | +`; |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +const blogEntryObj = new blogEntry(null, entryData); |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +export { blogEntryObj }; |
0 commit comments