Skip to content

Missing license information and legal questions. #13

@Falrinth

Description

@Falrinth

Hello!
First of all: Brilliant work! Thanks a lot for showing whats possible to improve workflow in Photoshop!

Sorry, I am new user on github and couldnt find other way to contact author on this site to ask questions about legal side of using these scripts in workflows while working on commercial projects and not sure if "Issues" are the right place to ask this question. Github articles about it states, that if there is no license information it defaults to no permissions even for public codes. So my question is: Are these scripts just for educational purpose, or one can lunch them freely during commercial work without the need of recreating their functionality themselves to have all legal bases covered? Is using them commercialy by the letter of law in case of missing license information forbidden or just for example selling or incorporating them into something bigger people would sell is the only forbidden part?

I would like to use and recommend using the script to colleagues in their commercial work, but now seeing the lack of license information and the github official stance that puzzles me i am not sure if that's even legal, looking stricly from law perspective. We can assume the reaons why people share their scripts as public and their intentions, but without the information its just that - an assumption.

Would appreciate some information.
Thanks a lot in advance!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions