Create tests for MSA.BuildingBlocks.ServiceClient

[kanilsz]

[kanilsz]

@Marusyk what do you think to have 2 subtask?

1. for unit tests.
2. for integration tests with WebApplicationFactory

Also if it makes sense a task for tests for MSA.BuildingBlocks.Mapping

[Marusyk]

tests for MSA.BuildingBlocks.Mapping?? What are you going to test there if it is just an extension for Automepper?
do you think it is not enough tested here https://github.com/LuckyPennySoftware/AutoMapper/tree/master/src?

[Marusyk]

what do you think to have 2 subtask?

for unit tests.
for integration tests with WebApplicationFactory

What logic are you going to cover by unit tests and by integration tests?

[kanilsz]

what do you think to have 2 subtask?
for unit tests.
for integration tests with WebApplicationFactory

What logic are you going to cover by unit tests and by integration tests?

for unit tests could cover extensions that the according if formed properly HttpRequestMessage (state based tests)
for integration create a minimal api app and endpoints (or something different) and check that it in complete it returns expected

[Marusyk]

unit tests for extensions? static classes? Very interesting, please show me

[kanilsz]

why not? or they don't have any behavior?