generated from Voyager162/portfolio_2025
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Open
Description
Ian (GITHUB User: Im2008)
MCQ and PPR Blogs
| Component | Grade | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| PPR Review TOTAL: | 0.85 | On my PPR review, I felt that I was less descriptive with other ideas like my code snippets and could've been more elaborative with the work that I explain. Generally especially on Component B where I could've elaborated more further on my snitplett and defined more terms, especially with correlation with my code, I feel I could improve more vastly if I analyzed my code to the relations of the PPR review. |
| MCQ Reflection TOTAL | 0.87 | MCQ has analysis on score gotten, re-reviewed questions that were incorrect, and giving the correct answer with reasonings for the answer. Gives strengths and weaknesses throughout the given MCQ, and gives room to improve as going into the AP exam. Overall, it provided an analysis of the MCQ, however the formatting of the blog could be a bit more organized. |
| Component | Grade | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| OVERALL Total | 1.72 | Sum of individual components |
Reviewer: Aarush Kota
Blog is organized, has CPT, PPR, & MCQ Corrections.
Glows and Grows are defined well in MCQ corrections, strengths, and weaknesses.
The video is less descriptive, too narrow, and does not provide enough explanation.
Code blocks are long, making them difficult to review.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels