NFR and glossary lacking details

[Jajared]

Describe the bug
More details specific to your product can be added. It seems like this was brought over from AB3/lacking specific contextual details.

Screenshot

[soc-pe-bot]

Team's Response

Current NFRs and Glossary is deemed sufficient by our team for this current version.

We will be adding more details in future versions.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement:

Important terms are missing from the glossary, such as what an Insurer is, what an Insuree is, insurance-related jargons.

---

❓ Issue severity

Team chose [severity.VeryLow]
Originally [severity.Medium]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: As someone who evaluated the product but did not have any experience in insurance-related terms, there were definitely situations where I was actually confused by what the terms meant. Precisely because this is a guide thus it must be reader-friendly.

---