Conflict of Interest statements

[Melissa37]

Feedback:

Suggest coi-statements wrapped in a wrapped in with a @Content-Type to declare what its referring to: COI-statement for this footnote group

Xref link: ref-type="author-notes” it should “coi-statement” (the thing it’s linking too - it’s not linking to the author-notes but the coi-statement itsel
f
Where “COI” is used - should be lower case

[Melissa37]

@kelly-mcdougall The peer review materials group has come up with this feedback on this recommendation.
This is an aspect of publishing peer review materials and seems to be sensible feedback.

@jeffbeckncbi I think the COI to coi will need to be dealt with via our attributes recommendation, so it would be worth looking at these other points at the same time?

I've moved this to requires review column so we can decide how to deal with it.

[Melissa37]

However, some have implemented this based on the current recommendation :-)

[Melissa37]

ID: Identification
PU: Prescribed Usage
CV: Controlled Values
SV: Suggested Values

https://jats4r.org/conflict-of-interest-statements

1. ID - @fn-type on . Use @fn-type=”COI-statement” to identify the footnote as a COI statement.binary