[PROPOSAL] Fix HDF4 library naming / organizational scheme #409
derobins
started this conversation in
Proposed Change
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
PROBLEM
The Autotools and CMake have very different ideas about how to name and organize their output.
From the Autotools (shared/Java/XDR - Fortran built separately as static)
bin
lib
From CMake (shared/Fortran/Java/XDR)
bin
lib
Note the differences:
libhdfvs AutotoolslibdfPROPOSED FIX
HOW WOULD USERS BE AFFECTED?
PRO
➕ CMake and Autotools products would have identical names
➕ Autotools Fortran output would be more modern, more like HDF5 (support shared, easier to bring improvements over)
CON
➖ Some users may be unhappy with the new names
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions